Blog 1 Molecular Analysis
Possible research questions
Introduction
Just like
humans, plants have various pathogenic bacteria’s which can lead to the death of
the individuum. A well-known bacterium is Erwinia
amylovora which causes fire blight. Another one is Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae that is known to induce bacterial
leaf blight. Especially fire blight is a huge problem in some regions in Switzerland.
Even though several remedies are on the market to fight off the bacterium, a
complete eradication is seen as impossible. (Arbeitsgruppe
Feuerbrand)
Usually the plants can only get treated after the first negative effects of the disease are visible. Often whole branches, or even the complete tree need to be cut down. Some treatments are prophylactic but have a low efficiency rate e.g. slaked lime. (HJ Schärer, A. Häseli, J. Fuchs, L. Tamm).
Usually the plants can only get treated after the first negative effects of the disease are visible. Often whole branches, or even the complete tree need to be cut down. Some treatments are prophylactic but have a low efficiency rate e.g. slaked lime. (HJ Schärer, A. Häseli, J. Fuchs, L. Tamm).
If the bacteria’s
presence could be identified before they are harmful to the plants, countermeasures
would be more effective. Molecular biology has some techniques which allow to
identify species solely on their specific DNA. The method that allows the
multiplication of DNA is called Poly Chain Reaction, short PCR. With PCR it is
theoretically possible to amplify one single DNA strand or a specific region in
the DNA and receive up to thousands strands or more. Together with specially
designed primers and polymerases, DNA regions, so called markers which are indicative
for every species, can be amplified and the occurrence of different bacteria is
possible to tell.(Madigan 579)
Different molecular techniques
Next to PCR,
many methods are possible to identify bacteria species. The easiest one is with
MALDI-TOF which isn’t a molecular technique. Anyhow, Flow Cytometry is a molecular
method that allows to stain special compounds e.g. cell membrane of different
species and analyse them in a fast and uncomplicated way. (Madigan). The cells are suspended in a fluid
and then injected into the instrument. Ideally one cell at a time flows through
a laser beam and the emitted light is characteristically to the cells and their
components scattered. With the fluorescent markers a better differentiation is
possible.
Time management and difficulties
PCR is a
very fast and easy method that takes no longer than a few hours. Which makes
the method difficult for soil or water samples is the fact, that some species
are very rare (low densities), or live obligatory anaerobic. Additionally, soil
samples first need to be purified, otherwise the PCR will give no clear results.
For this step special kits are available. The sample taking at the plantation
in Schinznach needs to be well prepared because it’s not clear at which regions
of the site Erwinia amylovora and Pseudomonas syringae spp. can be expected.
Fire blight that is caused by E. amylovora
has only been observed at apple and pear trees. This means that those samples
are best be taken at the region where those trees stand.(HJ Schärer, A. Häseli, J. Fuchs, L. Tamm) Pseudomonas
syringae spp. can be expected on all kind of plants. (Hirano)
Flow
cytometry is also a method which takes no longer than a few hours and gives
accurate results. Procedures for analysing the samples are already existent.
Further research
For further
research it would be necessary to find the optimal components for the PCR or
the flow cytometry and their respective procedure protocols. It is also necessary
to find the DNA sequence of Erwinia
amylovora and Pseudomonas syringae
spp. to match the perfect amplification markers.
Arbeitsgruppe Feuerbrand. Feuerbrand Grundlagen, Probleme und
notwendige Massnahmen. Pro Natura, Schweizer Vogelschutz, WWF, 4 Mar. 2008, p. 13.
Hirano, Susan S. ‘Ecology and Physiology of Pseudomonas Syringae’. Nature Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 12, Dec. 1985, pp. 1073–78. Crossref,
doi:10.1038/nbt1285-1073.
HJ Schärer, A.
Häseli, J. Fuchs, L. Tamm. Feuerbrand Praxisversuche Schlussbericht.
Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau, Nov. 2011, p. 30.
Madigan, Michael T.
Brock Biology of Microorganisms. Fourteenth edition, Pearson, 2015.
You've developed an interesting research question!The introduction and the chosen methods are described very clearly and comprehensible. In the case that we were looking for Erwinia, I hope and I do not hope at the same time that we would find this pathogen!
AntwortenLöschenHi Simon, you've written a succinct outline of molecular methods to find these pathogens and the possibilities they offer. This research question would be an interesting one. There are a few people at our institute that are quite knowledgable about fire blight, so some synergy might be possible. Your post has piqued my interest in these bacteria - I'm off to learn a little more about them, and about which microbial methods would be best to detect them. Cheers, Hallie
AntwortenLöschenDear Simon
AntwortenLöschenThank you for your overview about molecular detection methods for bacteria and especially for pointing out the best possible methods for our research at Schinznach. Since I had the same topic in mind, but with microbiological methods, I was interested in your suggested research concept. I am not sure where your information about E.amylovora only infesting apple and pear plants comes from since it is a pathogen to very many species in the rosacea family. Furthermore, limiting our search for this bacterium only to locations with apple and pear trees would induce quite a bias in our research concept since we want to detect possilbe pathogens in the irrigation system.
I am very curious about if and how this interesting and important topic will develop in this course, thank you for your input!
Cheers, Eva
Hi Simon
AntwortenLöschenA blog with a really focused topic as a research question. Unfortunately, you chose the most difficult one to perform to write details about. E. amylovora is currently relatively a small problem with limited sources, while P. syringae is a broad pathogen, that is quite ubiquitous. More chance to find it.
Technically: work more with reference database program (e.g., Zotero) and choose a consistent style.
Regards
Theo